Compare
How Altyst compares
Four comparisons, written for someone deciding where the underwriting work should happen. Each one says where Altyst is the wrong answer as plainly as where it is the right one.
17 minute read
Altyst as an ARGUS alternative
Where a lease-by-lease modeling environment is still the right answer, where reading the documents is the actual bottleneck, and how to tell which one you have.
10 minute readAltyst vs building the underwriting model in Excel
The comparison is not software against spreadsheets. It is who retypes the T-12, and whether a figure can still be traced in six weeks.
11 minute readHow to evaluate real estate underwriting software
Twelve questions for any vendor, what a good answer sounds like, and a scorecard to run your shortlist through.
6 minute readAltyst vs an analyst or an outsourced underwriting desk
A person brings judgment. Software brings iteration and consistency. Which half of the work belongs where.
How these comparisons are written
- Two products are named on this site, and only two: the spreadsheet, and ARGUS. Everything else here is framed around your decision criteria rather than a rival's feature list, because a comparative claim about a named product goes stale and a stale one is our problem rather than theirs.
- ARGUS is named because people search for it by name and deserve a straight answer. That page carries a non-affiliation notice, no logo, and its strongest section argues for keeping ARGUS.
- No rival's price is stated as fact anywhere on this site. Where a page has to deal with what something else costs, it says what the vendor publishes, says that the rest is second-hand, and tells you to get the quote.
- The only statements here about anything we do not control are neutral, functional, and checkable by you.
- Every claim about Altyst describes the product as it ships today, including the parts we do not do.
- Where a page tells you to test something, test it on your own deal rather than taking our word for it.
Also worth reading