Glossary · Returns and valuation

Gross rent multiplier

Also called GRM, Gross income multiplier.

The gross rent multiplier is the purchase price divided by annual gross rent. It is a screening ratio, useful because it needs no expense data at all, and unreliable for exactly the same reason.

Updated August 6, 2026 · All terms

How it works

It survives because of what it does not require. On a first pass through a list of properties you often have a price and an asking rent and nothing else, and the multiplier ranks them in seconds. It is the standard shorthand in small residential and in markets where operating statements are not routinely produced or not routinely believed.

What it cannot see is the entire expense side, which is where properties differ most. A building where tenants pay their own utilities and one where the landlord pays them can show the same rent at the same price with fifteen points of difference in expense ratio. It also cannot see capital condition, the tax bill after a sale reassesses the property, or the lease structure sitting behind the rent.

The denominator is not standardized either. Gross potential rent, in-place rent, effective gross income and total collections all appear in published multipliers, and the same property can be quoted at 11.5 or 11.8 depending on which was used. The multiplier is only comparable inside a group of properties whose income has been stated the same way. Use it as a filter, then compute a cap rate on whatever survives.

Formula

Gross rent multiplier = price / annual gross rent
  • State which rent is in the denominator: gross potential, in-place, or effective gross income
  • The implied gross yield is 1 divided by the multiplier
  • A monthly variant exists in small residential, where the denominator is monthly rent and the figure runs about twelve times the annual one

Worked example

Identical multiplier, 124 basis points apart

Illustrative. Two properties, each at $10,000,000 with $1,000,000 of gross potential rent and 5 percent vacancy, so both show a gross rent multiplier of 10.0.

Effective gross income, both$950,000
Property A operating expense ratio35%
Property A net operating income$617,500
Property B operating expense ratio48%
Property B net operating income$494,000
Cap rates of 6.18% and 4.94%the same multiplier, $2.0 million apart

Priced to Property A's 6.18 percent cap rate, Property B is worth $7,993,528 rather than $10,000,000. The multiplier ranked the two identically because it never looked at the thirteen point difference in expense load.

Conventions worth knowing

  • Use it to sort a list, never to price a deal. Anything that survives the filter gets a cap rate computed on a normalized NOI.
  • The sample property, at $55,900,000 over $4,870,800 of in-place gross potential rent, is an 11.48 multiplier. Its 5.40 percent cap rate is the number that actually priced it.

The common mistake

Comparing multipliers across lease structures

A net-leased building where the tenant pays taxes, insurance and maintenance keeps far more of its gross rent than a gross-leased one, so it deserves a higher multiplier on identical rent. Ranking the two side by side makes the net-leased asset look expensive and the gross-leased one look cheap, which is backwards. The comparison only holds inside a set of properties sharing a lease structure, a utility arrangement and a rent convention, and any deal that comes with an operating statement deserves the cap rate instead.

Every figure, traced to its source

Altyst computes these in exact decimal arithmetic, not with a language model, and clicking any number shows the formula behind it.