Glossary · Leasing

Triple net and expense recoveries

Also called NNN, Triple net, CAM recoveries, Expense reimbursements.

Under a triple net lease the tenant pays base rent plus its share of the property's taxes, insurance and common area maintenance. Expense recoveries are the mechanism that bills those costs back, normally as a pro rata share based on the tenant's proportion of the building's leasable area.

Updated August 6, 2026 · All terms

How it works

Lease structures sit on a spectrum. A full-service gross lease bundles everything into one rent, with the landlord carrying every operating cost. Modified gross sits in between, commonly with a base year or an expense stop. Triple net pushes taxes, insurance and common area maintenance to the tenant, so the landlord's income is closer to a net rent and the operating expense ratio is much lower. Absolute net goes further and hands over structure and roof as well.

The important mechanical detail is that recoveries are not a margin. Recovery income is offset by the expense it recovers, so a triple net property with $6.20 per square foot of recoverable expenses shows both the expense and roughly the matching income, and NOI moves only by the unrecovered portion. A model that adds recovery income without the corresponding expense creates income out of nothing.

What actually moves NOI is the leakage: vacant space has no tenant to bill, so the landlord absorbs the recoverable expenses on empty suites, and caps, exclusions, gross-up provisions and administrative fees all change the recoverable amount. Recovery ratios of 90 to 97 percent are common on a well-leased net property, and the gap is the landlord's real exposure.

Formula

Tenant recovery = pro rata share x recoverable expenses, adjusted for caps, exclusions and any administrative fee
  • Pro rata share = tenant leasable area / building leasable area, sometimes measured against occupied area instead
  • An administrative fee, commonly 10 to 15 percent, is often added to the common area maintenance component only
  • Vacant space produces no recovery, so the landlord absorbs recoverable expenses on empty suites

Worked example

One tenant's recovery, and where the leakage sits

Illustrative. 180,000 square foot building, 25,000 square foot tenant, recoverable expenses $6.20 per square foot of which $2.40 is common area maintenance, 15 percent administrative fee on that component. Building is 88 percent leased.

Tenant pro rata share13.89%
Tenant recovery before the administrative fee$155,000
Administrative fee on the CAM component$9,000
Tenant total recovery$164,000
Recoverable expenses on the 12% vacant space$133,920
Landlord absorbs from vacancy$133,920

The recovery itself is close to a pass-through. The number that changes NOI is the $133,920 the landlord eats on empty space, and it grows every time occupancy falls.

The common mistake

Assuming one hundred percent recovery on a partly leased building

Recoveries are billed to tenants, and vacant space has none. Modelling full recovery of taxes, insurance and common area maintenance on a building that is 88 percent leased overstates NOI by the recoverable expenses on the other 12 percent, which on this property is nearly $134,000 a year, or about $2.3 million of value at a 5.75 percent cap rate. Recoveries have to be modelled against occupied area and re-derived every time occupancy changes.

Every figure, traced to its source

Altyst computes these in exact decimal arithmetic, not with a language model, and clicking any number shows the formula behind it.